When unique is not unique
I have discussed the article "Network calls for consultation on submission numbers" (Peninsula News, January 10) with the author Mr Gary Chestnut.
Residents unfamiliar with the development assessment process may believe a "unique objection" is based on a dictionary definition.
This is totally wrong. The process is not that simple.
The definition is based on the Department of Planning's guidelines or similar policy, and is not easy to find and may not be unequivocal.
I have received advice regarding a council DA, providing information on "applications on exhibition", "make a submission", standard submission form template, but no definition of "unique submission" that is not open to interpretation.
Is the public submission process engaging with the community or disengaging with the community?
Those submitting objections to development applications for the first time may be interested in commenting on their experience, favourable or otherwise.
SOURCE:
Letter, 21 Jan 2025
Norm Harris, Umina