Nothing to discuss?
Val Tanner (Peninsula News, 31 Oct) reported that McDonalds "will employ at least three fulltime and up to 60 casual employees".
In August, the integrated planning unit of Gosford Council reported that there would be "130 full time and part time jobs".
At this rate of loss, McDonalds Umina will be the first fully automated fast food outlet on the planet.
Skye Oxenham of McDonalds Australia supplied the standard media release (Peninsula News, 31 Oct).
The response from McDonalds was predictable and didn't require a special board meeting.
When the Integrated Planning Unit reported to councillors on August 2, staff commented favourably on every possible issue that has any connection to the proposal without identifying any issue of concern.
This is the local government assessment process.
With overwhelming support from the planners, why would McDonalds need to defend the development?
The Integrated Planning Unit has provided 26 pages of support for the development.
It is not complicated and I am sure McDonalds' management has noted the support.
Is the Integrated Planning Unit of Council capable of assessing the DA, considering it has established overwhelming support for the project?
Skye Oxenham said "McDonalds will work closely with Council to take a consultative approach with the local community".
Why?
According to the planners, there is nothing to discuss.
Letter, 2 Nov 2011
Norman Harris, Umina