Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse Issue 505:<br />19 Oct 2020<br />_____________Issue 505:
19 Oct 2020
_____________
Collapse  CRISIS CRISIS
Council seeks $100M loan 'to maintain liquidity'
Government won't 'bail out' Council, says Crouch
Not clear whether Murphy was advised of financial crisis
West Ward councillor response to council financial crisis
Collapse  NEWS NEWS
Heritage ferry has its engine replaced
Peninsula has highest numbers of elderly,
Wheelchair converted to multi-purpose cart
Provisional driver charged following Pearl Beach crash
Elections to be held for Ettalong Diggers
Alcohol-free zones are re-established
Construction certificate issued for three units
Application to renovate Booker Bay marina
New proposal received for Ettalong site
Water mostly good for swimming, says council report
Path to be built at Pearl Beach?
Application for two-lot subdivision
Bridge club to seek review of community centre use
Umina to host women's network meeting
Ride to Work Day ride
Raffle held in lieu of Opera in the Arboretum
Rotary club plans to start dementia cafe
Rotary members celebrate hat day
High tea at the arboretum
Raffle raises almost $3000 for Pearl Beach hall
Club hears about Grandparents Raising Grandchildren
Almost no rain falls
Collapse  FORUM FORUM
Beachgoers deserve to feel safe
Inconvenient track work
Fake traffic studies for development applications?
Coronavirus prevention more luck than good practice
No reason why bridge ritual should not continue
Getting rid of states has complications
Collapse  HEALTH HEALTH
Infectious visitors 'no risk', says health chief
Meditation group to raise funds for Lifeline
Hospital encourages traditional mental health therapies
Grant improves the walk to podiatry service
Eczema sufferer takes advantage of telehealth
Donations received for children's charity
Collapse  ARTS ARTS
Folk club to hold first live concert since restrictions
Koala painting donated to arboretum
Art trail was 'well received'
Art gallery returns to regular hours
Collapse  EDUCATION EDUCATION
College delivered football course online
Breakfast club to run four days a week
Band practice resumes
Mobile dental clinic expected at Ettalong next month
Collapse  SPORT SPORT
Jemma Smith to compete with Newport
Plans for 'spot' skatepark in Woy Woy or Ettalong
Lachlan helps save Port Jackson sharks
Umina United takes over-45s title
Teeball and modball players wanted
Veteran Pairs bowls finals
Disabled Surfers cancel December event

Fake traffic studies for development applications?

Current methods used to measure the impact of new developments on traffic and parking make a mockery of traffic planning.

The associated reports could well be described as fake traffic studies.

They do little to aid the assessment of the effects on the local environment of proposed development.

The Traffic and Parking Impact Assessment Report supplied for DA 54551, the Farnell Rd development, is a case in point.

It is impossible for the consultant to accurately comment on road changes and traffic increase without knowing other traffic projections or the details of planned road engineering changes.

Data included in the report does not include increased traffic expected due to other development approvals, which other traffic studies have validated.

Changes to the intersection on McMasters Rd and Blackwell Rd in the same precinct are caused by other approvals during the short time DA 54551 was being assessed.

There are now three intersections affected, not two as stated in the report.

Council officers appear to take the reports on face value.

There is no evidence to suggest that they question apparently extraordinary claims about traffic impact.

In this report, statements to go unchallenged include, on page five, that there would be "no significant change in the performance of either intersection or the surrounding network" and on page 18 that "there would be no warrant to upgrade the local road network as a result of any additional traffic generated by the development".

The fact there are 46 pages of evidence is a certain indicator of increased road network use.

Similarly, the following statement on page 17 appears to have been accepted by council staff: "The 10-year design life scenario was not considered due to the relatively low magnitude of traffic generated by the proposed site in relation to background growth."

This would seem to justify the failure to plan for future infrastructure, when "background growth" is taken to be the growth projections of the Regional Plan.

Perhaps, this is why traffic studies submitted with development applications are not taken seriously.

The same issues apply with the increased business zone in the Bourke Rd, Ocean Beach Rd, Ryans Rd precinct development for the new petrol station.

Reconfiguration of this road corridor will be a resource and financial problem for the Council.

It is fundamental that the quality of information supplied with development applications is critically scrutinised by council staff - to assess a proposal's real impact, to provide for necessary infrastructure and to protect the Peninsula's character.

Every development approval means lifestyle change for the Peninsula's residents. SOURCE: Letter, 13 Oct 2020 Norm Harris, Umina





Skip Navigation Links.

Skip Navigation Links.
     Phone 4325 7369     Email us. Copyright © 2020 The Peninsula's Own News Service Inc    PO Box 1056 Gosford NSW 2250