Phone 4342 5333         Email us.

Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse Issue 237 - 12 Apr 2010Issue 237 - 12 Apr 2010
Collapse  NEWS NEWS
Collapse  DLEP DLEP
Collapse  ANZAC DAY ANZAC DAY
Collapse  FORUM FORUM
Collapse  HEALTH HEALTH
Collapse  ARTS ARTS
Collapse  EDUCATION EDUCATION
Collapse  SPORT SPORT
Collapse  HISTORY HISTORY
Collapse  PROMOTION PROMOTION

DLEP website misleading, says CEN

The Community Environment Network has described Gosford Council's draft Local Environment Plan website as "incorrect and misleading".

The region's peak environment group has stated that an independent inquiry by the Planning Assessment Commission may be needed if council continues to get its information wrong.

"This DLEP process has been going on for some time and we need to get it right," CEN chairman Mr John Asquith said.

"If council is not going to correct the draft LEP information, then an independent inquiry by the Planning Assessment Commission is needed to conduct public hearings and to publicly resolve these issues.

"Fact Sheet Seven, titled 'What are the changes made by the State Government', states that council was directed to remove a clause relating to environmentally-sensitive land as these areas could not be mapped due to the scale of mapping, lack of up-to-date information and invalidated data.

"However the Department of Planning in response to a question from the community group has advised that the removal of the clause was initiated by council staff (and not the Department) who did not want to have environmentally-sensitive land mapped in the LEP.

"The CEN is calling on Gosford Council to use its updated vegetation mapping (Bell, 2009) that was commissioned by council for this purpose and include it in the DLEP to protect environmentally-sensitive areas."

Mr Asquith said he was concerned that council had now placed mapping on the web link but had not made it clear that the mapping was not part of the DLEP.

"In addition, council has suggested that consideration was being given to a forum on the draft LEP after comments close and to amending conservation zones after the draft LEP is approved.

"Forums are of little value if the information given to the public is incorrect and the suggestions that zonings could be reviewed after the LEP is made are disingenuous as the LEP is not intended to be reviewed for five years.

"The public can have no faith that council would revise its zonings - including protecting its

COSS lands with a more appropriate conservation zone - at some later time.

"CEN is requesting the clarifications and corrections to be made as soon as possible and council extend the period for comments by 30 days."

  • Autism

    pictures/300_Autism.jpg

    Autism

  • AwaitDA

    pictures/300_AwaitDA.jpg

    AwaitDA

  • AwardWin

    pictures/300_AwardWin.jpg

    AwardWin

  • Bowls

    pictures/300_Bowls.jpg

    Bowls

  • Cable

    pictures/300_Cable.jpg

    Cable

  • Comp

    pictures/300_Comp.jpg

    Comp

  • Guides

    pictures/300_Guides.jpg

    Guides

  • Judo

    pictures/300_Judo.jpg

    Judo

  • Launch

    pictures/300_Launch.jpg

    Launch

  • League

    pictures/300_League.jpg

    League

  • Opera

    pictures/300_Opera.jpg

    Opera

  • OpShop

    pictures/300_OpShop.jpg

    OpShop

  • Pairs

    pictures/300_Pairs.jpg

    Pairs

  • Rain

    pictures/300_Rain.jpg

    Rain

  • RideBike

    pictures/300_RideBike.jpg

    RideBike

  • Rugby

    pictures/300_Rugby.jpg

    Rugby

  • Studio

    pictures/300_Studio.jpg

    Studio

  • SurfComp

    pictures/300_SurfComp.jpg

    SurfComp

  • Arthritis

    pictures/300_Arthritis.jpg

    Arthritis

  • Waterslide

    pictures/300_Waterslide.jpg

    Waterslide



Search this website


Contribute!

Skip Navigation Links.

Skip Navigation Links.
  Copyright © 2010 Peninsula Community Access Newspaper Inc