Phone 4325 7369     Fax 4339 2307     Email us.

Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse Issue 434 - 11 Dec 2017Issue 434 - 11 Dec 2017
Collapse  NEWS NEWS
Planning failure used to justify non-compliance
Sporties advertises for merger, as developer joins board
Dot Devine turns 104
King tides prompt renewed call to upgrade wharf
Tesch backs dredge cost-sharing
Clover Moore writes in support of oval lighting
Umina oval community garden to involve students
Sporties proposal attract more than 50 objections
Pizza shop may become licensed restaurant
Ministers call for pause to consider Christmas meaning
Peninsula included on Christmas lights map
Umina children's Santa run
Elderly man recovers from swimming incident
Club members win awards
ATM to stay
Patonga post agency closes
Jill Meredith receives award for community garden
National Parks service seeks help with graffiti
Youth forum hears from range of services
Work starts on boat ramp
Laine nominated as Volunteer of the Year
Plastic-free Peninsula group looks for logo
Neighbour alert program for bushfire emergencies
Rotary club hears of family support for parents in prison
Teenagers charged with alleged assault
Wicks mails out misleading energy information
Zero evidence of council applying itself
Do we have to wait another three years?
State Government will be to blame
Current planning strategy was obsolete before it started
Sport: a religion that unifies all
Where are the regional boundaries?
The depth of local knowledge
Radiotherapy scholarships presented by local resident
Collapse  ARTS ARTS
Choir presents Christmas performance
College farm to get new cattle truck
Ethics classes for all levels
Principal receives award for professional development
Excursion to Rumbalara Nature Reserve
Ettalong involved in Schools Spectacular
Students decorate tree at Erina
Umina lifesavers have standout performances
Gold awards in Duke of Edinburgh scheme
Birthday combined with presentations
Zara is rookie of the month

Planning failure used to justify non-compliance

An application to build three townhouses that do not comply with planning guidelines is being justified on the basis that the council has not followed the guidelines "on numerous occasions".

"It is clear that the numerical standards set out in the Development Control Plan have not been complied with on numerous occasions as there is strong demand for the availability of more affordable housing," the application for the development in Augusta St, Umina, has stated.

"There is a lack of large sites and development is constrained to smaller sites where setback requirements are difficult to achieve with economic yield of dwellings.

"Consequently, the numerical standards may be viewed as overly restrictive for satisfactory medium density development to take place.

"It is therefore argued that the proposed development should be considered an acceptable proposal as it is in keeping with the Plan objectives."

The application claimed that the council had recently approved similar non-complying developments on the same basis.

"Recently, the adjacent property (DA52076/2017) has been approved for a multi-unit development with similar design, setbacks and site cover.

"This application relied on previous precedents, where the setback standards were not complied with in the Umina and Woy Woy areas."

The three townshouses, costing $700,000, would replace a single brick house.

The first townhouse would include a side entry on the ground floor, which would also accommodate the kitchen, dining, living master bedroom, laundry, guest toilet and storage.

The first floor would include a lounge room, three bedrooms, linen and bathroom.

A ground floor courtyard would be accessed from the living room and the townhouse would also have two covered car parking spaces in a double garage.

The second townhouse would have one less bedroom, all three bedrooms would be located on the first floor and there would only be a single garage attached.

Townhouse number three would have the same four-bedroom layout and the first.

The proposed development, according to documents provided in support of the application, does not comply with the Gosford Development Control Plan 2013 for ceiling heights and setbacks.

The 2.7 metre ceiling heights on the ground floor were described as a "minor departure" from the DCP.

The setback variances are of between 25 per cent and 40 per cent.

The developer has justified the variations by stating: "The proposal is in keeping with the DCP setback objectives, the LEP zoning objectives and Gosford Affordable Housing Strategy 2005.

"The proposed development will make available affordable medium-density residential housing for the community.

"The proposed setbacks are the most suitable solutions to the existing site constraints.

"The proposal will rejuvenate the site and complement the desired form, orientation and scale of surrounding properties."

The documents submitted to Central Coast Council to support the construction of the townhouses also argued the proposed development was compatible with the predominant existing and desired character of the locality.


Add a comment
Comments entered here may be published in the Forum section of Peninsula News. Name, full residential address and daytime telephone number are required, but only name and suburb will be published. This is a moderated forum: Contributions will not appear here until they are approved by the editor. Contributions may appear in an edited form.



Search this website

What's On
<December 2017>
(Click for details)

Skip Navigation Links.

Skip Navigation Links.
  Copyright © 2017 Peninsula Community Access Newspaper Inc